I read this webcomic:
http://xkcd.com/261/at 15 til midnight and curiosity struck me with Godwin's Law. This drove me (again..) to wikipedia. I read the the entire article twice and then again clicking on the first thing I was not familiar with which was Reductio ad Hitlerum (other instances include names/theories/pop culture references... etc).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_HitlerumAfter following the same pattern, read, read again, click, I land at ad hominem.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominemAgain I followed the same pattern and now I am at a very specific concept through simple means.
I started with reading a thought provoking comic strip (which is sometimes over my head intellectually) and I picked one thing to explore. This
referred me to wikipedia and I followed the same pattern. Curiosity --> pursuit of knowledge --> discovery of basic concept(s) and then back out with each level the same way I went in
synthesizing this information.
Why am I writing this down? Two reasons: As a
nascent educator, learning about learning is a passion of mine and there is a heated debate about the efficacy of the internet.
I have heard professors, fellow students, and pure bigots
criticize wikipedia and the entirety of the internet for being an insurmountable mass of information that is, at times, complete bunk. My retort to that argument is: in an hour I went from reading a web comic to learning specifics about
grammar in the English language, intellectual debate, and more.
This is a wonderful, but promising, example of the sedentary lifestyle. 50 years ago this process would involve hours searching in a library, which you would have to drive, walk or take a bus to, then get a library card (if you're me then add lose library card and get new library card to this list of obstacles) in order to merely begin to utilize this resource. After these obstacles the size of the library would also have its limitations. How would someone go about self-education on the topic of spiraling conversational trends to Hitler comparisons in pop culture? The largest library in the world would have the obstacle of sheer size. Librarians would have to be professionals with great skills of navigation in order to traverse the columns of books.
Sure, the internet has its flaws (
http://www.glennbeck.com/) and wikipedia is not the end-all best source for accurate information but it is a start. And you have to admit the
efficiency is astounding. Overcoming misinformation is just a matter of society becoming skeptical of information and basing their knowledge on support from multiple sources and personal experience instead of developing an opinion solely from the megaphone of political pundits. Books are not free from misinformation and misinterpretations either. History shows us what happens with poor interpretations of religious text...
Pursuit of knowledge is an endless journey for society. The development of wikipedia, as well as other sites, in our generation has given us a tool to learn at a faster rate than our parents. We do utilize the internet but it is in danger of being reduced to censorship because of religious and capital agendas. The issue of net neutrality might not be volatile as nuclear disarmament, but when society chokes knowledge it begins to atrophy.
Opinions please.
words in bold are words that required use of dictionary.com for correct spelling
***This was originally posted on my facebook page (11-28-09)